What is the logic behind pro-life even if mom’s life is in danger?
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /usr/home/netsutra/public_html/visheshbusiness.com/smf/wp-content/themes/upvote/functions/theme-functions/theme-functions.php on line 327
I grew up around staunch people-lifers. Life begins at conception, end of story. However, every single one of them would have thought it stupid not to terminate a pregnancy that will endanger the mother. It was laughable.
If two people were drowning, but you only have one lifesaver, you don’t stand on the dock with your hands on your hips saying “tsk. That’s a shame…” no! You throw the lifesaver to the one you can save.
With pregnancy, if baby dies mom can be ok. But if mom dies, baby also dies. So what is the logic behind not allowing pregnancy termination if it is endangering mom?
-note, I know this is a hard topic in general. I want an open and kind discussion. I truly want to understand where these people are coming from.
submitted by /u/Late_Arm5956 to r/NoStupidQuestions
[link] [comments]
Leave Your Comment